Victoria’s Secret ‘sorry’ for transgender mannequin feedback

0
137

Victoria's Secret Fashion Show

Picture copyright
Reuters

Picture caption

Victoria’s Secret has been grappling with falling gross sales since 2016

Victoria’s Secret chief advertising and marketing officer has apologised for feedback he made about transgender fashions.

In an interview with Vogue journal, Ed Razek had stated the lingerie firm’s annual exhibits have been “a fantasy” and mustn’t embody them. Mr Razek later stated his remarks have been “insensitive”.

The 2018 present passed off on eight November in New York, that includes fashions Gigi Hadid and Kendall Jenner.

Victoria’s Secret has been grappling with falling gross sales since 2016.

Media playback is unsupported in your gadget

Media captionVictoria’s Secret in China: Lingerie and controversy

Gender ‘performs no half’

In a wide-ranging interview revealed on Thursday, Mr Razek and the corporate’s government vice-president of public relations, Monica Mitro, have been requested whether or not the model was placing extra emphasis on range.

Mr Razek, who’s a part of the casting workforce, admitted that he had “thought of” placing transgender and plus-sized fashions within the present, however had not as the corporate “didn’t market to the entire world”.

Mr Razek went on to say: “Does the model take into consideration range? Sure. Do we provide bigger sizes? Sure… Should not you might have transsexuals within the present? No. No, I do not assume we must always.”

“The present is a fantasy. It is a 42-minute leisure particular. That is what it’s. It’s the solely one in every of its form on this planet,” he stated.

Following a backlash on social media, Victoria’s Secret launched an announcement from Mr Razek on Twitter, which learn:

“To be clear, we completely would forged a transgender mannequin in our present. We have had transgender fashions come to castings… And like many others, they did not make it.”

“It was by no means about gender,” he added.

Others defended Mr Razek’s feedback, arguing consumers didn’t have to purchase the product if they didn’t agree with the corporate’s ethos.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here